Even I didn�t read the book you above mentioned, I really guess what that deals because it�s not
Single book deals with common believers trifle arguments to stick on their belief.
Just I want tell one argument to counter attack author of that book he says, �believers commit less crime than that of unbeliever � it�s actually a WRONG statement with out considering nature of human being. Killing is the ultimate opposite of the co-operation, human beings cooperating not because they
All are believes that is an in-built nature of the human beings before the religions came to existence in human society man was co-operative and he/she is social animal. You can see ants are co-operative beings with out religion but not cats it�s their nature CAN YOU SAY CATS AND LION CRUEL BECAUSE THE ARE NOT RELIGIOUS. Why ants are not killing each other IS IT BECAUSE THEY ARE RELIGIOUS?
And Author of book also Forget that fact of Relative value of the CRIME. Just try to study the
Ratio of criminals in the jails, how many believers and nonbelievers in the Jail
In the cause of COMMUNISM AND RELIGION Just Read What Marx Says.
Communist�s are not fools to simply oppose the religion they know well about what a religion can do In a society
�The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly a struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.
Religious suffering is at the same time an expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sign of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of men, is a demand for their real happiness. The call to abandon their illusions about their conditions is a call to abandon a condition which requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, the embryonic criticism of this vale of tears of which religion is the halo.�
-Karl Marx
Click here for the article
-smith ., Dubai,
