Both Shri.Nayanar and Shri.VS performed in their own way. Diplomacy and gradual implementation with consensus is often essential in democracy, which was a quality of Shri.Nayanar. Otherwise the whole process might get biassed/fail like 1957 EMS ministry or like Munnaar mission or like 'mathamillaatha jeevan'. (This just my personal view and ignore). At the same time, strong and pricipled action of Shri.VS is of course GREATER! Let him complete his mission, though there are small set-backs. Blaming any one by comparison will not give any result. Both are performing at different times under different constraints. (Nevertheless, I unconditionally apologize to all for the comment "അഞ്ജനമെന്നതു...." as it might have troubled anyone like Mr. Hari)
Click here for the article
-MK, UAE,
