1. Your heading itself is wrong. How come I am a gunda? Did I do any gundaism to anybody? Did I forcefully take anybody�s rights away? On the other hand communists do that. You call somebody gunda just because they criticize communism, uh?
2. How did you know that I am religious? Don�t jump in to conclusions.
3. What difference can you see in the act of Bhulan Devi and communism? Bhulan Devi took people�s rights away by force. Communists are doing the same, right? Let me ask you this question. Do I have the right to decide who to unload my properties from a vehicle? Do the government and police protect my rights in case of any conflicts?
Does a farmer have the right to use machines on their fields without anybody�s permission? Do the farmers have the right to decide what to do on their private property? Do communists respect their freedom and rights? If not, please don�t give me all this nonsense that Bhulan Devi�s act and Communism are different.
Bhulan Devi violated people�s rights in the name of poverty. Communists are taking people�s rights away in the name of ideology. In effect both are same. The fact is that in a free democratic society people should have every freedom to decide what to do on their private properties (Of course without violating others rights and freedom).
And what about killing people who does not agree with communism in communist countries? Did Bhulan Devi do the same?
4. As per you, I don�t know communism. In that case please explain communism in detail and also please answer my above questions.
5. What duty are you talking about? It is not somebody�s duty to provide job to somebody else. They have to get it by efficiency without violating others rights and freedom. What rights you have to say it is farmer�s duty do only farming on his land? If there is food deficiency; yes, we have to resolve it. But not by force fully taking somebody else�s rights and freedom. We have to find out a good solution for that. So please don�t give this communist version of duty to take away people�s rights and freedom.
6. You asked whether I know the situation in Kerala years back. If we had some bad history in the past, does that give you the right to suppress people�s freedom now? Feudalists oppressed poor people in the past. Communists oppress all kind of people (especially rich) always. What is wrong in earning money? Is earning money a bad thing? People should be free to earn money according to their ability? Is that not fair? Why should somebody share their money to others which they earned through their hard work and ability (If they are not interested)? We are already paying tax to the society according to the income. Poor people are poor not because of somebody else�s fault. No body is stopping anybody from earning money in a free democratic or capitalistic society. And nobody in a capitalistic society says poor people should be ignored.
7. Who is saying that employees should not get their deserved wages? They have every right to decide their wages. But they don�t have the right to say what others should/should not do. Everybody should have the equal rights irrespective of their gender, race, color, income and religious believes.
8. When Jesus said help the poor, I don�t think he meant that you should forcefully take money from somebody and give it to them. Nobody is stopping anybody from giving money to poor or helping them. The fact is that it should be of self interest, not by force or law.
9. Your last paragraph doesn�t make any sense. At least I didn�t understand it. Please make it clear.
Click here for the article
-George, NJ,
